Customer Logins

Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.

Customer Logins

My Logins

All Customer Logins

Carbon Capture from Coal Fired Power Generation

Process Economics Program Report 180B

View Report for existing customers Go to Customer Login for existing customers
Learn more about Carbon Capture from Coal Fired Power Generation
Contact Sales
Contact Sales +1 844 301 7334

Published December 2008

The largest and most expensive part of the overall carbon capture and storage process is capturing CO2 from a power plant. Maintaining coal as a viable source of electric power thus depends critically upon improving plant efficiency in order to produce less CO2 for a given amount of power generation, and on finding more cost-effective ways to capture the CO2 produced – either before or after combustion.

Pre-combustion efforts have focused on integrated gasification-combined cycle (IGCC) systems, in which coal is processed with oxygen and steam under pressure to form a synthesis gas that can be fired directly in a gas turbine. The CO2 can be removed relatively efficiently from the synthesis gas, but CO cannot, so before firing, the gas is sent to a water gas shift reactor that converts the majority of CO to CO2 and hydrogen. Following water gas shift, other gas conditioning operations are required including gas cooling and mercury removal before CO2 is removed from the synthesis gas using absorption. The extent of CO2 removed by this means is about 90%.

Conventional coal plants are faced with a more difficult task of capturing post combustion CO2 from flue gas at atmospheric pressure. The CO2 concentration of the flue gas from a supercritical pulverized coal (SCPC) power plant is typically less than 15%, with most of the remaining gas composition being nitrogen from the air used to support combustion. Nevertheless about 90% of the CO2 can potentially be removed from the flue gas by a post combustion process.

In this report we describe and review the economic units involved in the production of power from coal without and with the baseline techniques for carbon capture from post and pre-combustion capture using high grade bituminous coal for which IGCC is well suited. Economics are then compared four ways (without and with CO2 capture) to ultimately discover the cost of CO2 removed from nominal 550 MW supercritical combustion and IGCC power plants.

Other PEP Related Reports:

  • Carbon Dioxide Separation 180
  • Carbon Capture From Natural Gas Power Generation 180A
  • Advanced Carbon Capture 180C
  • Advanced Carbon Capture 180D
Find the chemical market research you need
CONTACT AN EXPERT

Products & Solutions from related industries

Chemical Image

Chemical Process Economics Program PEP

Chemical Image

On-Purpose Acetic Acid – Chemical production and investment cost

Chemical Image

On Purpose Linear Alpha Olefin Processes – Chemical production and investment cost

Chemical Image

Polyols for Polyurethanes – Chemical production and investment cost

Chemical Image

ABS Resins– Chemical production and investment cost Published 1966

Chemical Image

ABS Resins– Chemical production and investment cost Published 1972

Chemical Image

ABS Resin– Chemical production and investment cost Published 1980

Chemical Image

Acetal Resins – Chemical production and investment cost

Chemical Image

Acetaldehyde – Chemical production and investment cost

Chemical Image

Acetal Resins – Chemical production and investment cost

Chemical Image

Acetal Resins – Chemical production and investment cost

Chemical Image

Acetal Resins – Chemical production and investment cost

Chemical Image

Acetal Resins – Chemical production and investment cost

Chemical Image

Acetic Acid and Acetic Anhydride – Chemical production and investment cost

Chemical Image

Acetic Acid and Acetic Anhydride – Chemical production and investment cost

Chemical Image

Acetone Methyl Ethyl Ketone MEK and Methyl Isobutyl Ketone

Chemical Image

Acetylene – Chemical production and investment cost

Chemical Image

Acetylene – Chemical production and investment cost

{"items" : [ {"name":"share","enabled":true,"desc":"<strong>Share</strong>","mobdesc":"Share","options":[ {"name":"facebook","url":"https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3a%2f%2fqa.www.spglobal.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fproducts%2fchemical-technology-pep-carbon-capture-from-coal-2008.html","enabled":true},{"name":"twitter","url":"https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fqa.www.spglobal.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fproducts%2fchemical-technology-pep-carbon-capture-from-coal-2008.html&text=Carbon+Capture+from+Coal+Fired+Power+Generation+%e2%80%93+Chemical+production+and+investment+cost+%7c+S%26P+Global","enabled":true},{"name":"linkedin","url":"https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=http%3a%2f%2fqa.www.spglobal.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fproducts%2fchemical-technology-pep-carbon-capture-from-coal-2008.html","enabled":true},{"name":"email","url":"?subject=Carbon Capture from Coal Fired Power Generation – Chemical production and investment cost | S&P Global&body=http%3a%2f%2fqa.www.spglobal.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fproducts%2fchemical-technology-pep-carbon-capture-from-coal-2008.html","enabled":true},{"name":"whatsapp","url":"https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Carbon+Capture+from+Coal+Fired+Power+Generation+%e2%80%93+Chemical+production+and+investment+cost+%7c+S%26P+Global http%3a%2f%2fqa.www.spglobal.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fproducts%2fchemical-technology-pep-carbon-capture-from-coal-2008.html","enabled":true}]}, {"name":"rtt","enabled":true,"mobdesc":"Top"} ]}
Filter Sort